Locking up peaceful protesters is often viewed as a sign of a broken justice system. In democratic societies, peaceful protest is a fundamental right, protected as a form of free speech and assembly. When authorities resort to jailing individuals who are non-violently exercising this right, it suggests a troubling shift toward authoritarianism or a failure to address underlying societal issues.

Many critics argue that imprisoning peaceful protesters reflects a system that prioritizes control and suppression over dialogue and justice. It often signals that the government or law enforcement is more interested in silencing dissent than engaging with public concerns or demands for change. Additionally, the disproportionate punishment for non-violent actions can erode public trust in the legal system, as it appears to protect the powerful while marginalizing those fighting for social justice or political reform.

Examples of this can be seen in various countries where peaceful protests have been met with heavy-handed responses. In such cases, international human rights organizations have frequently condemned governments for violating principles of free expression and assembly, urging them to protect these fundamental rights rather than criminalize them.

Ultimately, when a justice system fails to differentiate between peaceful protest and violent acts, it undermines the very principles of fairness, democracy, and civil rights.